Education in Sussex and why we need the charity sector

In September 2024 we launched Reaching Potential, our latest report in the Sussex Uncovered series. These reports give a broad picture of the facts across Sussex around our different funding priorities.

The Reaching Potential report highlights the challenges faced by communities in Sussex, compared to the regional and national picture. It specifically focuses on some of the issues preventing people – especially young people – from achieving their full potential and features some of the charities and groups we support who work in this area.

In the Reaching Potential report we identified three critical areas:

Education attainment and participation

Pupils in Sussex perform below national averages at Key Stage 2, with 11 of 13 Local Authorities showing lower attainment in reading, writing, and maths. Eastbourne records the poorest performance, with fewer than half meeting expected standards. At GCSE stage Sussex also underperforms, against the South East and national averages, with Hastings showing the weakest outcomes. Crawley, Arun, Eastbourne and Rother similarly fall short across key metrics, including GCSE grades and attainment scores.

Further education and apprenticeships

Apprenticeship participation and achievement rates for under-19s in Sussex are below the South East and national averages. Additionally, young people aged 19-24 are less likely to engage in apprenticeships, community learning, or further education compared to their peers across England.

Pupil absences

There is a clear link between absence and attainment. Persistent absence increased significantly post-Covid but slightly improved from 2021/22 to 2022/23. Secondary schools face higher persistent absence rates, particularly among girls in Brighton & Hove, while boys are more likely to be persistently absent at primary school.

A graph showing peaks of school absences since 2018/2019

"Without this programme I would be a lot less aspirational. I think it has made such a big difference it’s hard to put into words. They helped me look at life in a more holistic, authentic way - not just academic. Sometimes things happen that are beyond your control. Being able to respond positively to those changes is what matters. The biggest thing is breaking that wall between what I thought I needed to be like to do these."

Student at Villiers Park

Read the full case study from Villiers Park.

Educational inequalities and disadvantaged groups

The report highlights disparities for pupils with Special Educational Needs (SEN) and other disadvantaged groups.

Pupils with SEN

Sussex has a higher proportion of pupils with SEN than regional and national averages, particularly in Speech, Language, and Communication needs. Educational outcomes for SEN pupils in Sussex are below national standards, with boys performing worse than girls.

A table listing types of SEND needs

 "J is a young person with SEN who has struggled in recent times with mental health issues. To help address these challenges, J joined Amaze as a volunteer to help run the peer support sessions. J’s mental wellbeing began to improve and through this voluntary work discovered he had a talent for youth work and the advocacy of young people with SEN."

Member of staff, Amaze Sussex

Continue reading J's story from Amaze.

Disadvantaged communities

Children eligible for Free School Meals (FSM), non-English speakers, and young carers face significant educational barriers. Sussex has a higher proportion of Children in Need than England, with Brighton & Hove having the highest rates. Parental mental health issues are the leading reason for Children in Need assessments, often linked to higher persistent absences, exclusions, and suspensions. FSM-eligible pupils perform below South East and national averages at both Key Stages 2 and GCSE.

Language barriers

Sussex has a higher proportion of non-English speakers than the South East, although lower than the national average. Crawley has the highest rates of pupils with a first language other than English, exceeding the national average, and these pupils tend to perform worse at Key Stage 2 and GCSE stage than their peers in the South East or nationally.

Employment and jobs opportunities

Employment challenges in Sussex stem from poor transport links and a lack of large urban centres. East Sussex has lower job density (60.74 jobs per 100 working-age population versus 77.86 for England) and longer travel times to large employment centres (39 minutes compared to England’s 16 minutes). Hastings has the second-lowest job density in Sussex and the longest travel time to major employment hubs (55 minutes).

Small businesses dominate East Sussex, with fewer large employers compared to the South East and England. Horsham, Rother and Wealden have the highest proportion of small businesses, while Crawley has the highest proportion of large businesses.

Adult skills and employment

Unemployment rates are higher among those with no or low qualifications. Crawley and Hastings have the highest unemployment among individuals with no qualifications, and Brighton & Hove has the highest unemployment rates across all skill levels.

"Coming to People Matter made a huge contribution to my newfound confidence. I became excited about looking for work and about the future, because they were so helpful and made the most daunting, seem easier, with supportive and helpful discussions, and I was able to engage with someone on my own level."

A beneficiary at People Matter Trust

Read the full story from People Matter Trust.

See more of our case studies or watch our Reaching Potential video below:

How can you help?

Although the findings of the report might seem grim, we know it’s not all bad news. In Sussex we have an amazing charity sector working hard who need our help. Together, we can help pave the way for a fairer and more equal future for as many as possible.

Join us to make a difference and donate to our Reaching Potential Fund. Contact our Philanthropy team at 01273 490 440 or email jackie@sussexcommunityfoundation.org.

“The report starkly demonstrates the challenges that our communities in Sussex are facing. Everyone should be entitled to reach their potential at every stage of life. We have a long way to go towards that, but there are many brilliant local charities that are doing everything possible to help people be the best they can be.”

Kevin Richmond
-
CEO, Sussex Community Foundation

Reaching Potential: OCSI's work with the Foundation to understand the challenges in Sussex

Sussex Community Foundation commissioned OCSI’s (Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion) research team to assist with their 'Sussex Uncovered' series, which highlights the challenges Sussex faces, bringing data-driven insight.

Reaching Potential is the latest report in the series. It aims to support the grassroots charities and community groups that are helping communities to develop their skills and confidence, overcoming barriers to learning whilst improving opportunities for marginalised groups in deprived areas.

It builds on the previous report on Tackling Poverty which highlighted issues of poverty and social care challenges. 

Methodology

We analysed and evaluated data under seven key themes identified through discussions with the Foundation about their strategic priorities for Sussex:

Due to a lack of up-to-date, open-source data on education, the report primarily focuses on data from the Department for Education (DfE) School Census which captures detailed information relating to characteristics and attainment levels of pupils who attend maintained schools. One limitation with this source is that data is not available below Local Authority level due to privacy concerns, data suppression policies and the statistical unreliability of small sample sizes. 

As such, unlike the Tackling Poverty report where we were able to aggregate data from small neighbourhoods to major towns and rural areas in Sussex, this report primarily analyses data from larger areas (Local Authorities and above). Where possible, we have included data from the 2021 Census to provide a greater insight into issues faced by particular local areas.

Key findings

The majority of areas in Sussex are underperforming at Key Stage 2, with some areas experiencing low rates of attainment, resulting in lower rates of continued education

Most areas in Sussex underperform at Key Stage 2, with 11 of 13 Local Authorities below the national average of 59.9% for reading, writing, and maths. Eastbourne performs the worst, with only 49.2% meeting the standard. Hastings also shows the poorest outcomes at Key Stage 4, with the lowest scores in GCSEs, Attainment 8, and Progress 8. Subsequently, young adults in Sussex are less likely to enter higher education, with Hastings and Adur showing particularly low participation rates of 27% and 29%, compared to the national average of 40%.

Educational inequalities persist into adulthood, with high proportions of adults lacking qualifications in disadvantaged areas. However, some of the most educationally disadvantaged communities have seen greater improvements in adult skill levels over the last 10 years

Many communities in Sussex show high rates of adults without qualifications. Hastings (20.1%), Arun (19.7%), Adur (19.5%), Rother (18.9%), and Eastbourne (18.4%) exceed the national average of 18.1%. However, Adur reduced the proportion of adults without qualifications by 6.1 percentage points from 2011 to 2021, and Hastings saw a notable increase in adults with degree-level qualifications.

Pupils in educationally disadvantaged groups experience lower attainment (ie achievement of specific academic standards) compared to similar groups elsewhere in England

Pupils eligible for Free school meals, disadvantaged pupils, pupils with English as an additional language and pupils with Special Educational Needs are less likely to meet expected standards in reading, writing and maths at Key Stage 2 in Sussex than across the South East region and England as a whole.

Job opportunities are fewer, and access to employment is more difficult in communities with poorer educational outcomes

East Sussex has lower jobs density (60.7 jobs as a ratio of the working age population) compared to the national average of 77.9. Residents also face longer travel times to employment centres, averaging 39 minutes compared to 16 minutes nationally. Additionally, only 30.7% of jobs in East Sussex are high-skilled, compared to 36.6% across the South East.

To explore these challenges in more detail, you can read the Reaching Potential report here, or the executive summary here.

Aaron Henderson
Communications Officer, OCSI

Find out more about OCSI’s research services

One year in: trustee Deirdre's perspective on joining the Foundation

Deirdre Prower joined the Foundation as a trustee in 2023. This Trustees Week she tells us about her position, one year into the role.

I was delighted to be asked to join Sussex Community Foundation as a trustee last year. One year on, I am just beginning to understand how much work is involved in what the Foundation strives to achieve. I am in awe of the commitment of the staff who work here. They engage with donors, local partners, and individuals to make their philanthropy a reality. They encourage the voluntary sector in Sussex and support a diverse number of small charities to make grant applications. This means that an enormous amount of work is done looking at funding priorities, making evidence-based decisions around the grant making process and finding the funds to support all this.

Why did you become a trustee at the Foundation?

I felt that becoming a trustee gave me an opportunity to put the knowledge of thirty years working in the local health service to best use. I believe in the Foundation’s mission and have seen firsthand the important contribution the voluntary sector makes to local communities. With the pressure on our public services greater than ever, this contribution is vital to meet the diversity of need in Sussex. Small local charities are quick to see an opportunity to support people and fill the gaps in local provision, from children to older people and so much more - there is much we can do!

What experiences do you have of being a trustee?

As well as my primary care nursing background, I have been a trustee at a Sussex Hospice and I am a governor at Chailey Heritage Foundation. Both these roles have given me insight into the running and support that is required to nurture the development of a charity, in this case, Sussex Community Foundation.

What do you enjoy about being a trustee?

I enjoy working with a diverse group of professional trustees and staff who are committed to making Sussex a fairer place to live. There is so much to learn, for example: obtaining insight into the changing challenges facing our local communities or sitting on the grants committee and witnessing the variety of applications the Foundation receives. I also enjoy being able to meet and talk to the funded charities themselves. It is rewarding to feel that as a trustee I can make a contribution… albeit small!

What are your responsibilities as a trustee at Sussex Community Foundation?

As well as attending the quarterly Trustee Board meetings, I sit on the Grants and the Audit & Risk committees. In addition to these commitments, I regularly meet with fellow trustees and the senior management team to oversee the running of the charity.

I also represent the Foundation on the East Brighton Trust and the Lewes Fund, including attending grants decision panels.  

"All charities are different but there are some common themes which help me contribute to the governance of the Foundation. As trustees, we are responsible for ensuring that the Foundation is financially sound, well-run and meets its charitable purpose. In meeting these obligations, I see my role as being a supportive friend who offers constructive challenge."

Deirdre Prower, trustee
What does a day in the life of a trustee at the Foundation look like?

My day might be reading and preparing for committee or board meetings. I can visit charities, advocate for the Foundation with potential donors or represent us at various events - no two days are ever the same!

What advice would you give others thinking of becoming a trustee?

Go for it! The rewards are worth it.

How financial planning and charitable gifting can go hand in hand

For more than 25 years, Herbert Scott has helped people achieve their life’s goals through meaningful financial planning and that often includes charitable gifting.

Our focus is often on clients coming up to, or in the early phases of, retirement. Understandably, as clients age, the early question of “have I got enough to live the life I want in retirement?” evolves into “what can I do to mitigate my Inheritance Tax bill?”.

Charitable gifting

Not all clients have wider family to pass their funds on to, and even those that do still often wish to undertake an element of charitable gifting. This can either be during their lifetime, when the value of the gifted funds could potentially be outside of their estate immediately, or in their Wills when the rate of IHT applied can be reduced from 40% to 36% where 10% or more of their taxable estate is left to charity.

Working with Sussex Community Foundation

It is at times like this that we often turn to the expertise of Sussex Community Foundation to better the philanthropic conversations we have with our clients. From our viewpoint, involving the Foundation in these discussions provides us with confidence about the charitable gifting our clients undertake, safe in the knowledge that the charities have undergone the scrutiny of the Foundation’s due diligence. It also broadens our clients’ awareness of charities which are of particular interest to them and gives them the opportunity to have as much (or as little) involvement with the charities as they feel comfortable with.

Case study

We recently introduced an elderly client to the Foundation, after using our cashflow planning software to establish she had more than sufficient wealth to meet any eventualities she was likely to encounter during her remaining lifetime, including the potential funding of care fees. She wanted to see what other options there were to reduce the Inheritance Tax bill on her estate and, while she was not averse to paying some Inheritance Tax, the idea of having some control over where her surplus money was spent appealed, rather than leaving this decision to the Government on her death.

We explored options such as increasing gifting to her family, investing in tax-lead Inheritance Tax planning schemes, and charitable gifting. At this point, we introduced our client to the Foundation so that they could help her gain a better understanding of the range of local charities and community groups that aligned with her philanthropic interests. Under their guidance she decided to set up a Donor Advised Fund.

On a personal note, I continue to be heartened by the number of clients who are interested in making charitable donations as part of their financial plan and having good conversations around this subject is a valuable part of the service we provide.

Tracey Payne BA(Hons), Chartered FCSI, DipPFS
Investment Director & Financial Planner

Herbert Scott Ltd
The Left Bank, 173 High Street, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 1YE

enquiries@herbertscott.uk
www.herbertscott.co.uk

Herbert Scott is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority.

This article is distributed for information and/or educational purposes and should not be considered investment advice or an offer of any product for sale.

Should I gift or should I sell?

We all know there are tax benefits to making gifts to charity but do we always think how best to make these donations?

Gifting cash to the charity

The most common form of gifting - and if the donation is ‘gift aided’, there will be tax benefits for both the donor and the charity. 

The charity will be able to claim back an additional 25p for every £1 gifted and if the donor is a higher or additional rate tax payer they will also knock off 25p/31.25p from their tax bill for every £1 donated. 

It can get even better for individuals if their taxable income falls in either of the two quite punitive marginal tax bands – if their income is between £50,000 and £60,000 the tax saving could be higher as it will reduce the amount of child benefit claw-back, or more commonly for individuals who earn between £100,000 and £125,140 the tax saving could be 50p per £1 donated (on top of the 25p claimed directly by the charity) as they will be able to extend the band at which taxpayers start to lose their tax free personal allowance. 

It is also important to consider the timing when you make donations. Donations can be carried back one year on the tax return as long as this tax return has not already been filed – worth considering if one tax year you are in these marginal tax bands not the year after.

Gifting an asset to the charity 

Our client did not have much income in the year in question and so there would have been very little tax relief in gifting cash to the charity. We therefore discussed gifting an asset to the charity instead. If the charity is willing to accept the asset the gift could happen without a Capital Gains Tax charge.    

The charity would be able to sell the asset with no tax charge and the donor would be able to make a gift and save themselves a potential Capital Gains Tax bill. 

If the individual also had income in the year there might be an Income Tax deduction for certain qualifying assets (broadly listed shares and interests in UK land and property).   If the gift of an asset is a possibility for both the donor and the charity this is worth exploring as the combined Capital Gains Tax and Income Tax saving may exceed the tax reliefs for a gift aided cash donation. 

Understandably it is a big ‘if’ that the charity will accept the asset as you would be passing on the burden of administering and selling the asset to them, which the charity may not have the capacity to do. Sussex Community Foundation will accept a donation in the form of assets in certain situations so it is certainly worth a conversation with them if this could be on the agenda. 

Selling an asset to the charity

Our client was looking to gift a certain amount to the charity and was thinking of selling an asset worth more than the intended gift. We therefore discussed the possibility of selling the asset to the charity at undervalue to achieve the same result.  

For example, say some shares are worth £75,000 and the intended gift was £50,000. Our client could have sold the shares to the charity for £25,000.  

The donor would be in the same position – they would have £25,000 cash in their pocket but importantly the sale at undervalue to the charity could happen on a no gain/no loss basis.  Therefore, no Capital Gains Tax to pay (although worth noting that if the £25,000 proceeds was higher than original purchase price there would be Capital Gains Tax to pay). There could also be an Income Tax deduction if there is sufficient income and the assets were qualifying listed shares. 

The charity would also be in the same position – it would have shares worth £75,000 which cost them £25,000. The net donation to them is therefore £50,000 as intended by our donor. 

Again, this puts an administrative burden on the charity so it would need a discussion to see if something like this could be accommodated. 

Deed or Gift

In some cases, a charity may be reluctant to take on the management of an asset. The charity may accept the gift but ask the donor to sell the asset on their behalf. By signing a deed of gift, or exchanging letters, the donor may be able to achieve the same tax benefits while saving the charity significant administration and management time. 

In summary, it is always worth discussing alternatives with clients when discussing charitable gifting and always worth discussing with a representative of the charity to see if they will accept donations in the form of assets or sales at undervalue. I’m sure Sussex Community Foundation would love to have conversations like these with potential donors.

What is philanthropy (and why might you need some help with yours)?

“It is more difficult to give money away intelligently than to earn it in the first place” 

Andrew Carnegie

I’m not sure I agree wholly with this famous quote from one of the world’s best-known philanthropists but it expresses a sentiment with which many can identify. That we want our personal giving to make a real difference in the world and that it’s often hard to know how to do that well.

It’s easy to get stuck on what is and what isn’t philanthropy, so let’s deal with this before we move on. 

Yes, its etymology is in the Greek ‘love of humanity’. Yes, it’s historically often associated with super-rich western, white men who are either dead and well-known (Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller for example) or alive, associated with the tech industry and well-known (Gates, Bezos, Zuckerberg and co). And yes, it’s probably helpful to make some distinction between charity and philanthropy.

Whilst both are a form of private action for public good, charity can be thought of as more impulsive and emotionally driven, short-term in nature and perhaps responding to a public appeal or requests from networks to support a particular cause. Philanthropy is usually thought to be more strategic, considered and taking a longer-term approach that seeks to make meaningful change and address the root causes of issues if it can. Of course, both are critical to a well-functioning civil society.

There are also numerous different approaches people and institutions might take to philanthropy: cheque-book philanthropy; citizenship philanthropy; wholesale philanthropy and venture philanthropy are just some. Impact investing and participatory grant-making too. Some approaches are now virtually movements themselves, such as Effective Altruism or the Patriotic Millionaires.

But as the world moves on so does philanthropy.

Today, I would argue that anyone who thinks deeply and considers how they can best deploy their time, their talent or their treasure to create social impact should be considered philanthropic. So, this includes the many thousands of inspiring volunteers who give their time and expertise each week to our local community groups. For example, by helping at food banks or giving expert advice on benefits with their local citizens’ advice bureau. 

And wealthy tech bros don’t have the monopoly on being strategic with their use of capital to address social goals. Indeed, they’re not always very good at it. The command & control, top-down approach suitable for a Silicon Valley start-up doesn’t translate well to the messy, real world of non-profits and social impact.

By contrast other voices and methods are now coming to the fore.

Mackenzie Scott has given away billions of dollars to non-profits around the world since 2019 with $2.15 billion to 360 organisations in 2023 alone. She does it quickly, over multiple years and largely without restriction on use, recognising that those doing the work know how best to use the funds.

Mackenzie Scott

What could loosely be called ‘community philanthropy’ is also on the rise. Taking one example from thousands around the world, in Nepal, Tewa, is a community of several thousand ordinary women, pooling their resources to transform the lives of other women and the most vulnerable in their communities.

Another is the ‘soup’ model which started in Detroit and has now spread around the world including to Sussex. You pay a few pounds to enjoy a bowl of soup in a community venue, network, hear pitches from within the community, cast a vote and the winning pitch takes the pot.

These different models and approaches aren’t mutually exclusive. But you might still need help and advice to ‘do’ philanthropy well. Which brings us to Charles Dickens…

Was Dickens the UK’s first philanthropy advisor? The famous Victorian novelist and depicter of the urban poor worked closely advising Angela Burdett-Coutts, a wealthy heiress of the fortune from her grandfather who was former Senior Partner at the famous bank. Angela had the capital and the power to spend it but her status as a woman in Victorian society prevented her from accessing the information required to do so well. Dickens supported her with this, researching need, presenting ideas and even directly managing projects such as Urania House, a home for former prostitutes and their children. Coutts estimate that with Dickens’ help she gave away at least “£350 million in today’s money” and was also key in setting-up the NSPCC and Royal Marsden specialist cancer hospital.

Angela Burdett-Coutts

Very few of us have access to the capital that Burdett-Coutts did yet the need for some help and advice in giving well can be just as compelling.

At Sussex Community Foundation we meet people every week who want to put something back into the community in which they live and work but aren’t sure what route to take. We are here to help.

Sometimes they are passionate about particular causes such as homelessness or supporting children & young people but need advice to navigate a complicated sector so any financial support makes the biggest difference possible.

Often, people want to hear from us what the local challenges are in Sussex. Here our deep connections with the voluntary sector and research such as on ‘Tackling Poverty’ are invaluable in sharing stories and providing an evidence base for effective decision making. This can really help with the move towards a more strategic approach with philanthropy.

Ultimately, our mission is to champion and enable all who want to make a positive contribution to our local area through effective philanthropy and community action. We believe in the power of community and if you do too let’s talk.

by Stephen Chamberlain, Head of Philanthropy

Uncovering Sussex: How evidence-based research helps Sussex Community Foundation to tackle poverty

Sussex Community Foundation commissioned our research team at Oxford Consultants for Social Inclusion (OCSI) to produce a Tackling Poverty report, to gain insights into Sussex's poverty levels, continuing the 'Sussex Uncovered' series.

The report establishes a baseline of data about poverty in Sussex, and the Foundation intends to use the evidence gathered in this report to inform their development as a community foundation. 

Methodology

We began our work by analysing and evaluating data under five key themes that emerged from conversations with the Foundation on their key strategic priorities for addressing poverty across Sussex. These are: 

We used our experience in producing Needs Profiles for other Community Foundations and knowledge of the data landscape to identify key metrics to analyse under those themes.

We explored data from a range of sources, including administrative datasets (data which is created or collected when people interact with public services, such as schools, the NHS, the courts or the benefits system, and collated by the government) collected by government departments, such as claimants of means tested benefits and homeless statistical returns. We also explored self-reported survey data from the 2021 Census.

Where possible, data was collected over a five-to-ten-year timeframe to allow exploration of the impacts of wider socio-economic changes and challenges over time, particularly in the context of the pandemic and cost of living crisis. 

We investigated the performance of Sussex’s Local Authorities, major towns, rural areas, and neighbourhoods, and produced our findings as a narrative analysis, supplemented with data visualisations. We used our data mapping and reporting platform, Local Insight, to simplify aggregation of data to the Sussex neighbourhoods and quickly export population statistics for the areas under review.

We chose to use this narrative-driven approach to highlight the trends and issues we discovered in a way that builds an easy to understand story of a local place. This allows stakeholders to see the woods for the trees and aids in gaining a deeper understanding of the issues at hand and how they intersect with each other. 

Findings

We identified four clear challenges faced by Sussex communities in their campaign against poverty.

Challenge 1: An ageing population

Sussex’s population is older than the national average, and the 65+ population is projected to grow by 41.3% between 2020 and 2040. Already, rising social care and poor health burdens are creating challenges for the region’s public health services. The associated fall in the working-age population will likely lead to a reduction in labour market demand and may also increase labour market costs, while the potential loss of salaried employees could reduce disposable incomes and impact on consumer spending.

Challenge 2: High levels of long-term illness and poor outcomes for those with a disability

17.6% of people in Sussex have a disability, compared to 15.6% in the South East and 16.9% in England. There is strong evidence to suggest that people with disabilities across Sussex are more likely to experience material deprivation challenges - alongside the general health challenges associated with long-term illness and disability.

Challenge 3: Inflationary pressures are contributing towards financial hardship

The region is experiencing financial pressures due to the rising costs of living, which is impacting on the availability of affordable housing and the overall cost of essentials. Those in Sussex’s rural and coastal communities are especially vulnerable to the rising costs of energy bills, with 8.2% of homes in those areas found to have had a low energy efficiency rating - more than double the national average (3.3%).

Challenge 4: Multiple deprivation challenges in coastal communities​​

Each of the eight most deprived towns in Sussex is located in coastal communities. These towns face a range of issues, from economic struggles to social welfare concerns.

Stefan Noble
Director and Head of Research, OCSI

January 2024

Help us now on tackling poverty.

Donations are pooled with others in the community to enable impactful grant making in this area. You can make donations of any size and it will make a real difference to people’s lives.

Donate

Ten years of growth

Writing this at the end of just over ten years in the Sussex Community Foundation Grants Team, I realised that my working career after leaving university started out in a Grants Team. So, in a way I really have come full circle!

After 27 years in the British Council (where I started as a Grants Officer and then took on a variety of different roles), I took the plunge, heading into the voluntary sector in Sussex, working for three very productive years in a volunteer hub, managed by Crawley CVS. It was there that I first heard about the Foundation and its philanthropic work, supporting communities across the county. I can still recall a slide from CEO Kevin Richmond’s presentation, which featured a filing cabinet. But this was not just any filing cabinet Kevin explained, this had been purchased by a group using a grant from the Foundation to bring order to its office! From that moment my attention was grabbed, and interest in the work of the Foundation was born.

It was serendipitous that the closure of the volunteer hub in 2013, coincided with the Foundation recruiting for a Grants Administrator, for which I immediately applied. I arrived to join a very friendly and supportive team of five based in Lewes, and I always knew when it was Wednesday as the gentle aroma of brewing beer from Harvey’s brewery would greet me as I stepped off my train at Lewes Station.

There were just two people in the Grants Team in those days, and I found myself on a fast learning curve (not least discovering just how extensive the voluntary sector was across the county). At the same time, the Foundation was implementing a new system to manage its grants – an exciting challenge, but not without its stresses!  

I recall a busy office, and being a small team frequently meant all hands to the pump. Inevitably administration occupied a significant proportion of our time, but there were plenty of opportunities to interact with applicants, whether on the phone or in person. At that time, we were giving out just under £1m in grants (a figure that would rise to over £4.2m during the height of the Covid pandemic) across four grant rounds. I recall panel meetings for which mountains of papers had to be meticulously prepared (and worrying just how many trees had been cut down in the process) and always feeling a certain sadness that there were always more worthy applications than we had money to fund. 

Under three inspiring managers, both the scope of the Grants Team and my role in it grew and developed. As well as playing a largely administrative role, I became gradually more involved with specific programmes, especially those funded at a national level by statutory and private sector partners and those developed in partnership with UKCF. There were local initiatives too, including those embracing the arts (a passion of mine) such as the Westdene Fund, which supports talented young musicians. One of the delights of administering these awards was meeting young inspirational people, who were so passionate and knowledgeable about music. 

Interaction with community groups across Sussex was an especially important part of my job, and it was a delight to get out of the office to witness what was being achieved with our grants. It was little surprise that my interests were soon focused on encouraging and advocating the work of infrastructure (Voluntary Actions) and ‘second line’ groups – something I am still passionate about and believe in today. The partnerships formed are some of the most positive aspects of my time at Sussex Community Foundation and I leave this behind as my legacy.

The past ten years have seen considerable growth in the Foundation’s grants activity, and a doubling of the grants team to four full-time staff in response. Online systems have replaced paper files, and we (mostly) marvel at the relative ease with which we now process applications that previously had required much ‘copy and paste’. Increasingly we work with our colleagues in Voluntary Actions delivering training and workshops to help potential applicants access our funding: which has helped develop a special relationship between the Foundation and these organisations.

There have been many highlights for me during my time at the Foundation. This includes the huge honour of being invited to a Buckingham Palace Garden Party in 2018, in recognition of a particular programme I had worked on. 

I couldn’t end though, without mentioning the amazing work the whole Sussex Community Foundation Team put in during the Covid pandemic, often under very demanding circumstances. Untested, untried, hitting the ground running this work was exciting, challenging, at times frustrating, but ultimately hugely impactful and life changing. It was humbling to be so regularly involved in activity that presented the voluntary sector at its very best, and which achieved such remarkable impact.  

I leave the Foundation with many happy memories, colleagues past and present who have become friends for life, a real sense of achievement, but above all heartfelt thanks for the privilege of 10 years of helping make Sussex a better place to live in for those now and future generations.

Adrian Barrott

Grants Officer from 2013 to 2023

Skip to content